• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Decision Desk HQ

Elections Returns, Analysis and Projections

  • Home
  • Results
  • Forecasting
  • Analysis
  • Solutions
  • Contact

What The 2018 Texas Senate Results May Tell Us About Beto O’Rourke’s Chances In 2020

March 14, 2019 by Miles Coleman

Today, the already crowded field for the 2020 Democratic nomination grew as ex-Rep. Beto O’Rourke announced his candidacy. With O’Rourke entering the race, it may be worth looking at how he fared last year.

Elected to Congress originally in 2012, O’Rourke represented the strongly Democratic TX-16 (El Paso). After two easy re-elections, he ran statewide for Senate against Sen. Ted Cruz (R) last year. Despite Texas’ red hue, its drift to the left in 2016, coupled with Cruz’s polarizing reputation, provided an opening for Democrats in 2018. While O’Rourke ultimately fell 2.6% short of beating Cruz, he had the best showing for a Democrat in a Texas Senate race since 1988.

One of the most impressive things about O’Rourke’s run was that he received 168,000 more votes than Hillary Clinton in 2016, even as he ran in a lower-turnout midterm year:

Generally, O’Rourke’s gains came from the Austin area, as well as the suburbs of the major population centers. By contrast, he lagged Clinton in the urban core areas – such as Houston itself – as well as in the Rio Grande Valley. These redder areas tend to experience greater than-usual turnout drops in midterm years, but O’Rourke’s relative weakness with non-white voters will be something for Democrats to consider.

Breaking things down by Congressional District, he won 16 of the state’s 36 districts. Further, Cruz narrowly held districts like districts TX-03, TX-22, and TX-31, which all were typically darker shades of red:

Before the general election in 2018, O’Rourke faced two opponents in his primary; they provided at least a modicum of competition. He won the nomination with 62%, but his coalition was telling:

Aside from his El Pao base, O’Rourke put up the deepest shades of blue throughout the liberal Austin area, as well as the wealthier suburbs of Houston and Dallas. He did worse in wide swaths of the heavily Hispanic counties south of San Antonio, which went to Sema Hernandez. Likewise, you can see most of the majority-black precincts in urban areas voting for Ed Kimbrough (who was black himself). In the general election, O’Rourke’s similarly leaned heavily on the constituencies that provided his landslide primary win.

Overall, if the Democrats end up nominating O’Rourke, he’d likely be well-positioned to improve on Clinton’s gains with suburban and college-educated voters, while his ability to excite minority is looking like an open question.

Filed Under: 2020 President, Analysis

Primary Sidebar

Sign Up for a Free DDHQ Results Account and Newsletter Subscription

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Search By Category

2020 President 2022 Midterms 2023 Elections 2024 Elections 2024 President Ad Spending Analysis Covid-19 DDHQ ChatAI Delegate Count Forecasting Model Governor Guest Editorial House International Elections Mapping Methodology municipal elections News Podcast Polling Predictions Race Preview Race Update Ranked-Choice Voting Results Runoff Senate Special Election - Congressional Special Election- State Legislature State Legislative Election UK 2019 Election Uncategorized Virgina Legislative Results

Search By Month

Footer

  • Home
  • Results
  • Forecasting
  • Analysis
  • Solutions
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

© 2021 Decision Desk HQ ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

This site uses cookies and external scripts to improve your experience.

Privacy settings

Privacy Settings

This site uses cookies and external scripts to improve your experience. Which cookies and scripts are used and how they impact your visit is specified on the left. You may change your settings at any time. Your choices will not impact your visit.

NOTE: These settings will only apply to the browser and device you are currently using.

Google Analytics

Powered by Cookie Information